May 26th, 2010: Grammar with Grave
Posted by Gravecat at 7:00 am under Mini-posts, Rants. Comments (2)
Posted by Gravecat at 7:00 am under Mini-posts, Rants. Comments (2)
Have. Have. It’s “could have,” not “could of.” God dammit, people.
Gravec.at: Blogging Like It's 1999Have. Have. It’s “could have,” not “could of.” God dammit, people.
Lu — May 26th, 2010 @ 9:26 am
I’m guessing my rather butchered “could’a” is totally unacceptable?
Lu — May 26th, 2010 @ 2:22 pm
Oh also, I really hate it when people use “seem to of” as well. It’s like they’re trying to be fancy and elongate “seem to’ve” but neglect to realise that ‘ve is short for “have”.